雅思大作文怎么写_如何拿高分

新网编辑教育资讯 2025-12-25 17

一、雅思大作文到底考什么？

官方给出的Task 2要求只有一句话：写一篇不少于250词的议论文，回应题目观点并给出自己的立场。看似笼统，实则暗藏三条评分红线：

（图片来源网络，侵删）

Task Response：是否完整回应题目所有要求，有无跑题。
Coherence & Cohesion：段落逻辑是否清晰，衔接是否自然。
Lexical Resource & Grammatical Range：词汇与语法是否多样且准确。

二、拿到题目第一步：拆解而不是翻译

很多考生习惯把题目翻译成中文再动笔，结果容易遗漏限定词。正确做法是三步拆解法：

圈出主题词：例如“Some people think that the best way to reduce crime is to give longer prison sentences.” 主题词是reduce crime。
识别限定词：best way、longer prison sentences。
确定题型：这是典型的“观点类”(opinion essay)，需要明确表态。

自问自答：如果我只写“监狱能否减少犯罪”而忽略“best way”，会丢TR分数吗？
会。因为题目问的是“最有效方法”，不是“是否有效”。

三、高分结构：四段还是五段？

官方从未规定段落数量，但推荐四段式：

Introduction：背景句 + 改写题目 + 明确立场
Body 1：支持观点 + 解释 + 例子
Body 2：反对或让步 + 解释 + 例子
Conclusion：重申立场 + 建议/展望

五段式适合“双边讨论并给出自己观点”题型，中间两段各讨论一方，第三段再强调自己立场。注意：段落再多，逻辑必须闭环。

四、开头段模板：如何三句话拿定考官印象

模板不是套句，而是骨架+个性化填充：

（图片来源网络，侵删）

背景句：There is no denying that + 同义改写主题词。
争议句：While some individuals argue that..., others hold the opposite view。
立场句：From my perspective, I firmly believe that...。

示例： There is no denying that curbing criminal activities has become a pressing issue worldwide. While some individuals argue that extending jail terms is the most effective deterrent, others contend that alternative measures should be prioritized. From my perspective, I firmly believe that a combination of longer sentences and rehabilitation programs is indispensable.

五、主体段展开：PEEL法则

Point – Explain – Example – Link 四步循环，确保每段至少80词。

Point：Firstly, lengthy incarceration removes dangerous individuals from society. Explain：This temporary isolation prevents potential offenders from committing further crimes, thus lowering the overall crime rate. Example：In the United States, states that implemented “three-strikes” laws witnessed a 17% drop in violent offences within five years. Link：Therefore, the incapacitation effect of longer sentences should not be underestimated.

六、词汇升级：同义替换与话题词库

避免重复使用crime、reduce、prison，可替换为：

crime → criminal acts / delinquency / law-breaking behaviour
reduce → curb / mitigate / alleviate
prison → correctional facility / penitentiary / incarceration

同时准备话题词库：教育类：curriculum, rote learning, holistic development 科技类：automation, algorithmic bias, digital divide 环境类：carbon footprint, renewable energy, ecological degradation

（图片来源网络，侵删）

七、语法多样性：三种高分句式

1. 倒装：Only by integrating education with punishment can society uproot the causes of crime. 2. 虚拟：Were the government to allocate more funds to rehabilitation, the recidivism rate would plummet. 3. 分词结构：Faced with soaring juvenile delinquency, policymakers are compelled to rethink existing strategies.

八、常见误区与急救方案

误区	急救方案
字数不足250	每段末尾加一句“Thus, this example underscores my point.”
跑题	写完后用荧光笔标出所有主题词，缺啥补啥。
模板痕迹重	替换动词：argue→contend→assert；删除空洞短语：in the modern era。

九、实战演练：完整范文

题目：Some people believe that increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Introduction
It is often argued that elevating fuel costs is the ultimate remedy for alleviating traffic congestion and environmental degradation. While this fiscal measure may yield short-term benefits, I contend that a multi-faceted approach is more sustainable.

Body 1
Admittedly, higher petrol prices can deter car usage. When driving becomes prohibitively expensive, commuters are incentivized to switch to public transport or cycling. For instance, after Singapore introduced its Electronic Road Pricing scheme, peak-hour traffic volume declined by 15%. Nevertheless, this policy disproportionately affects low-income households, exacerbating social inequality.

Body 2
Conversely, investing in alternative infrastructure offers a more equitable solution. By expanding metro networks and constructing dedicated bicycle lanes, governments can provide viable substitutes without penalizing the poor. Copenhagen’s commitment to cycling superhighways has reduced carbon emissions by 90,000 tons annually, proving that accessibility, not austerity, drives behavioural change.

Conclusion
In summary, although raising petrol prices can mitigate traffic and pollution to some extent, its regressive impact renders it insufficient. A synergistic strategy combining fiscal tools with green infrastructure is imperative for long-term urban sustainability.